The only general conclusions you can draw from all the Public Inquiries I have been blogging about in the last few weeks are that their conclusions don’t conclude very much :-
- They make recommendations that are rarely followed through.
- They usually don’t result in action being taken against the perpetrators of injustices.
- They only succeed in letting politicians and senior management off the hook for any responsibility by delaying action until they have often left post.
- They certainly provide lawyers with the opportunity to ask endless questions; pick apart every witness statement word by word; dance every word on the head of a pin; Oh! And make loads of money.
So is there a SMILING way of doing inquiries? With rapid outcomes, justice and compensation.
How about making them truly public. Start an open debate on line and in public meetings. Dispense with the lawyers. Have a maximum three month time scale. Write a three page report on the facts, the arguments and the recommendations.
Then have a referendum vote on TV with phone-in votes.
Any court action and compensation to be concluded within three months.






