“An Unholy Trinity”

The Trinity is a sacred alliance that stands up for good over evil.   The end of a life should be the celebration of all that has been good in a person’s lifetime.   There are positive things to draw out of every person given birth on this earth.   Lost in the past sometimes, but worthy of thanks nonetheless.   That is why life is sacred – a gift given by God only to be taken away by God.

FIRSTLY, I have regularly been blogging since 2010 about assisted dying (see “The Slippery Slope” in the TAG CLOUD).    A euphemism for euthanasia.  A well argued case by Debbie Purdy reignited the debate (see “Lucy Died Today” dated 22 March 2010 in the Archive).    Debbie’s arguments were based on the practical reality of chronic illness and the wisdom of planning ahead.   I have always been worried that although the merits of individual cases have been extremely well argued, turning them into precedents leads us on to a perilous slippery slope.

SECONDLY, the more recent  and disturbing headlines have been about the increasing promotion and use of a care planning tool – called the “Liverpool Care Pathway”.   This well intended approach was designed for use as a pain management process in a highly controlled and caring hospice environment for those with a diagnosed terminal illness.  Each word of this specification is critically important and was not meant to be loosely or casually interpreted.   Neither should it be a  basis for hasty decisions which exclude relatives.

THIRDLY, in the last two years the boundaries of these two clearly thought out positions have been blurred.   It’s the extrapolation into the wider domain of the hard-pressed, cash-strapped, bed-blocked, express delivery NHS that takes on a much more dangerous complexion.

I have written throughout my GrumbleSmiles blog about a host of reports over the last two years referring to care of the elderly and the NHS (click on “Neglect Shames Britain” in the TAG CLOUD).   Dehydration and malnutrition in the NHS have become recurrent features of care of older people in these reports.   There is no grand plan here.   Nobody took a clear decision and nobody now takes responsibility.   “Nil by mouth” has become the “Black Death” mark at the bottom of the hospital bed.   The unwritten, unspoken sign that an elderly burden on society may be too great a cross to bear.

It’s frightening and almost unthinkable to imagine that we may have inadvertently developed a new policy for almost two-thirds of the people who enter our hospitals.

A carefully planned approach to later life and a caring, compassionate end to life has emerged as an ugly monster of neglect.

ManSmilew-BIGboard Cropped 118

This entry was posted in Assisted Suicide, HEALTH and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to “An Unholy Trinity”

  1. John Good to see you as the ‘Thunderer’ questioning ones ethics. A difficult subject on a personal and a social level to accept!!! Do the accountants and HMRC look at the balance to be paid, not ones maker: but to ones earthly creditors, and do we now need a balance over £23K ( Or have we introduced a ‘SURVIVAL SUM’- That the politicans may play around with ‘The Church’ I assume would not remain silent on this subject: Or at Least I would hope not?), to remain living as a choice???
    By the way John Happy New Year, and to all the readers of this Blogg-David.

  2. davidwfreeman237 says:

    It is now Monday 27 April 2015, and the headline of the Daily Mail was is, ‘ people OVER 75 should be asked how they wish to die? As you have stated John in many a blog on this site, this is not the ‘Question?/ and certainly not the way to publicise the issue, especially as we are now in the middle of a general and local election campaignie, the reaction will be a knee jerk one and Ill considered, and I suspect miss understood by many?
    There is a time and a place when ones loved one, and those who care have to acknowledge that the future quality of life for that loved one is not so comfortable, that family decisions and personal decisions have to be considered with the medical ,professionals, with I trust a little guideance from (Above) ones man of the cloth (Which ever faith).
    I think and believe the hyppocratiic oath should remain paramount, and that the legal system of the land should defend such beliefs. How one makes caeveates for those who may make choices I still believe should be by in the end 12 persons true and honest sitting on a jury, so that the decision of any individual involved is not a simple Yes or No, but a considered belief of what ones fellow citizen may wish for collectively? We are animals and we need to survive with strength and conviction both in a mental capacity as well as in a physical body. We must renew our faiths and beliefs, but not in dogma? that gets no one anywhere!
    Here endeth the lesson.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s